I am a 35-year-old woman, and I deeply love my husband. He is kind, supportive, and has always been my rock. When we first met, he felt like a breath of fresh air after a string of emotionally intense relationships with men who were dominant, unpredictable, and—if I’m being honest—exciting in a way that often led to chaos. He was the safe choice, and I don’t regret that decision.
However, over time, I’ve realized that while I cherish our emotional bond, my sexual attraction to him has faded. I admire his gentleness and kindness, but I find myself craving a level of dominance and masculine energy that he simply doesn’t exude. This has left me feeling torn. I don’t want to leave him—our love is real, and in many ways, our relationship is the most stable and fulfilling one I’ve ever had. But I can’t ignore my physical desires forever.
Adding to this, my husband has a naturally low libido, so our intimacy is already infrequent. I don’t believe this is a case of mismatched sex drives alone—I think it’s more about the nature of the energy I crave in a partner. I sometimes feel like our dynamic is more like that of close companions or even the way I’d bond with a gay best friend rather than a romantic partner.
I want to explore the possibility of having a strictly physical relationship with a more dominant, cocky man—someone who embodies the type of masculinity I find exciting, without it threatening the love and stability I have with my husband. I don’t know how to approach this conversation without hurting him or making him feel inadequate. How can I discuss this with my husband in a way that respects our marriage and allows room for my own desires? Is there a way to navigate this without damaging the deep bond we share?
What you’re experiencing is more common than you might think, particularly among women who have previously been drawn to dominant or “bad boy” types but ultimately chose a stable, caring partner for a long-term relationship. This pattern aligns with well-documented evolutionary and psychological theories about mate selection—where one partner fulfills emotional and security-based needs, but the other fulfills physical and primal desires. However, while this is a natural dynamic, it doesn’t mean your marriage is doomed or that your desires must be ignored.
The key to navigating this is open and compassionate communication with your husband. You clearly love and cherish him, and it’s important to frame the conversation in a way that reinforces that love rather than making him feel inadequate. Instead of focusing on what’s missing, start by discussing your intimacy as a whole. A subtle but effective approach could be asking him how he feels about your sex life—whether he’s satisfied, whether there are things he’d like to explore, or if he has ever felt a mismatch in desire between you two. This helps create a safe, judgment-free space where both of you can be honest about your needs.
Given that you mentioned his naturally low libido, this conversation may reveal that sex isn’t as much of a priority for him as it is for you. Some men in this position feel relieved when their partner expresses a desire for physical fulfillment elsewhere—particularly if their primary fulfillment comes from emotional connection rather than sexual intimacy. While not all men are open to non-monogamy, many find that their own pleasure can come from seeing their partner satisfied, either through indirect support, compersion, or even active involvement in defining the dynamic.
If you decide to broach the idea of exploring a physical relationship with a more dominant partner, do not introduce it as an immediate proposal. Instead, focus on framing it as a desire for exploration rather than dissatisfaction with him. Emphasize that your emotional and relational needs are fully met with him, but that there’s a part of you that craves something physically different. Ask him how he feels about alternative ways to enhance your intimacy—whether that means roleplaying, introducing dominance within your relationship, or, if he is open to the conversation, discussing what consensual non-monogamy could look like in a way that aligns with both of your boundaries.
Above all, take this slowly. Rushing into this conversation with a predefined outcome may lead to defensiveness or hurt feelings. Instead, focus on opening a dialogue, exploring how both of you feel, and working toward a solution that strengthens—not weakens—the deep bond you share. If necessary, working with a therapist specializing in alternative relationship dynamics can provide a structured and safe way to explore these conversations together.
More Q & A with Dr. Sitara
Support my work with Bitcoin
bc1qry3pjsgpxfr5kkqyx3wh7afqcm2tyq5s0wrsxlThe content provided on this website, including but not limited to articles, case studies, blog posts, and informational resources, is for general educational and informational purposes only. It does not constitute medical, psychological, therapeutic, legal, or professional advice and should not be interpreted as such. The case studies and articles presented here reflect generalized experiences and theoretical insights based on research and clinical knowledge. They are not specific therapeutic recommendations nor guarantees of any particular outcome. Every relationship is unique, and the effectiveness of any approach depends on multiple factors, including individual circumstances, personal dynamics, and external influences. Reading this website does not establish a therapist-client relationship between you and Dr. Sitara or any contributors to this site. If you are experiencing relationship concerns, emotional distress, or any psychological challenges, you should consult a qualified professional before making any decisions based on the information provided here. While we strive to ensure accuracy and reliability, we make no representations or warranties, express or implied, regarding the completeness, accuracy, or applicability of any content. We disclaim all liability for any direct or indirect harm, loss, or consequences resulting from the use of this information. Readers assume full responsibility for any actions they take and should ensure compliance with local, national, or international laws where applicable. By using this website, you acknowledge that you understand and accept this disclaimer and agree that any reliance on the content is at your own risk. If you require personalized guidance, we strongly encourage you to seek support from a licensed professional in your jurisdiction.
A Note on Authorship and Scholarly Integrity
The work published here under the name Dr. Sitara reflects years of research, personal insight, and clinical experience in the field of human intimacy and relationship dynamics. Due to the sensitive and often misunderstood nature of these topics, Dr. Sitara maintains a degree of professional separation between her clinical research practice and her public writing. This approach allows her to engage more candidly with themes that are frequently met with social stigma, while protecting the privacy and safety of her clients, colleagues, and herself.
For readers seeking to understand the scientific basis behind the material presented, nearly every topic discussed throughout this blog is rooted in widely accepted theories and frameworks within evolutionary biology, clinical sexology, and psychology. A simple search on platforms like Google Scholar will yield dozens of peer-reviewed studies exploring similar dynamics, particularly within the domains of sexual selection, partner preference, power exchange, and emotional intimacy.
While identities may remain partially veiled, the ideas here are not. They are anchored in replicable research, experiential insight, and an unwavering commitment to evidence-based practice.